Nationality, war and justice

Nationality, considered as a definition for the protection and pride of the resources available in a country. The resource may be human resource, mineral resource or intellectual resource. Whatever it may be, a country always tries to protect it by whatever means possible. That's the reason the whole earth is demarcated with imaginary lines with definite sovereignty. We maintain armies to protect and extend these ideals of particular nationality. These boundaries became so important for a nation to defend, sacrificing people living in it with an apprehensive fear of being subjugated by one another with the mistrust between countries. If one considers the safe and wellbeing of people, there would be no wars. If one asks, what's the difference if the Kashmir is in the hands of Pakistan or India till the people of Kashmir could able to lead a happy life with basic amenities provided to them? A land has nothing to do with the country for it to sacrifice so many souls to defend something that has nothing to do with the safety and happiness of the people. A war is the war of ideologies and power but never people but always the blame should go to those who initiate violence. In this era, all countries are joining together to create universal brotherhood holding the most sophisticated arms, saying it as defense. What kind of brotherhood is born out of mistrust between nations?

All they give is the fake calls of peace to fool people around the world for the justification of the violence. If, in a war when one country is showing unjust and other country involves in the war for justification, does this mean that a small part of land is against the remaining land? So, those kinds of unjust acts can be only subjugated by the violence, what can be the repercussions? If we are so into the act of brotherhood, when one country is fighting for good, why can’t all other nations of the world support it to give a decisive victory? If one country is doing unjust, considering the act of brotherhood again, why can’t we teach them the reasonable way of life and provide them with the resource of happy living. Isn’t it what a brother will do? One might say that it is not so easy. Yes, it may not be easy but that doesn’t mean that we should resort to violence, which is not also an easy thing, keeping thousands of lives in line.

Nations talk about brotherhood while waging wars because they want resources of other nations and war is the justification. There is always a way to educate people if they take wrong path and keep them in right tract and show them the way for happy life but in the name of nation, they won’t do it. Cause however forward the nation may be, there is always something left for it to achieve and it is always busy in it and we call it as an Economy. All nations are concerned about their own individual development and it is also the right thing but we shouldn’t act under the veil of brotherhood. One shouldn’t fool people and an individual shouldn’t get fooled.

There is no brotherhood built with armies at the borders. An army of a country shows its mistrust towards other nations. The might of the army is a pride and threat to others. There can be no peace and no universal government and if one has to do it, there should be arms to extend help but not to defend and punish others.

It will be extended with “economic development” in the next article.